{"id":11130,"date":"2019-05-14T13:47:33","date_gmt":"2019-05-14T11:47:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/?p=11130"},"modified":"2019-06-13T14:00:37","modified_gmt":"2019-06-13T12:00:37","slug":"monsanto-hit-with-2-billion-verdict-losing-third-roundup-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/monsanto-hit-with-2-billion-verdict-losing-third-roundup-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"Monsanto Hit with $2 Billion Verdict Losing Third Roundup Trial"},"content":{"rendered":"

Baum Hedlund Law, 13 May 2019 | Source<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

May 13,\u00a02019 \u2013 Oakland, California \u2013 \u2013\u00a0<\/strong>An Alameda jury in the\u00a0case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto Company (Case No. RG17862702, JCCP No. 4953)<\/a>\u00a0returned a verdict today of $2.055 billion in favor of a husband and wife with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ordering Monsanto to\u00a0pay $55 million in\u00a0compensatory damages\u00a0and $2 billion in\u00a0punitive damages ($1 billion each for Mr. and Mrs. Pilliod) for\u00a0failing to warn consumers that exposure to Roundup weed killer causes non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

$2.055 billion total verdict<\/p>\n

Breakdown: $55,206,172.80 compensatory and $2 billion punitive<\/p>\n

Alva Pilliod<\/strong><\/p>\n

Compensatory:
\nPast economic \u2013 $47,296.01
\nPast non-economic loss \u2013 $8M
\nFuture non-economic loss \u2013 $10M
\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n$18,047,296.10<\/p>\n

Punitive damages \u2013 $1 billion<\/p>\n

Alberta Pilliod<\/strong><\/p>\n

Compensatory:
\nPast economic \u2013 $201,166.76
\nPast non-economic \u2013 $8M
\nFuture economic\u00a0 \u2013 $2,957,710
\nFuture non-economic \u2013 $26M
\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n$37,158,876.70<\/p>\n

Punitive damages \u2013 $1 billion<\/p>\n

Alberta Pilliod verdict form<\/a><\/p>\n

Alva Pilliod verdict form<\/a><\/p>\n

The verdict is the third in a row against Monsanto (now Bayer). Combined with the first two legal defeats (the\u00a0Johnson v. Monsanto<\/em>\u00a0verdict of $289.2M and the\u00a0Hardeman v. Monsanto<\/em>\u00a0verdict of $80M), verdicts against Monsanto in the Roundup cancer litigation now stand at $2.424 billion with 13,400 cases still pending in state and federal courts. (Johnson\u2019s verdict was later reduced to $78.5M but his verdict is on appeal.)<\/p>\n

A press conference on today\u2019s landmark verdict will be held at the offices of Audet & Partners in San Francisco at\u00a04:30\u00a0p.m. Plaintiffs Alva and Alberta Pilliod and their legal team will give statements on the verdict. A Q&A with the attorneys will follow. Details can be found below.<\/p>\n

Monsanto Loses Third Straight Roundup Cancer Trial<\/h2>\n

Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Livermore, California couple in their 70s, used Monsanto\u2019s Roundup weed killer together for more than 30 years to landscape their home and other properties. They were both diagnosed with the same type of NHL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), associated with Roundup exposure. In 2011, Alva was diagnosed with systemic NHL in many of his bones, which spread to his pelvis and spine. Alberta was diagnosed with NHL brain cancer in 2015.<\/p>\n

In their Roundup cancer lawsuit, the couple attributed their cancer diagnoses on exposure to Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, and accused Monsanto of fraudulently representing that Roundup is safe despite scientific evidence linking exposure to NHL.<\/p>\n

At trial, attorneys for the Pilliods,\u00a0Michael Miller of the Miller Firm<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0R. Brent Wisner of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman<\/a>, showed jurors a trove of internal Monsanto documents<\/a>\u00a0they say demonstrate the agrochemical giant\u2019s manipulation of scientific literature, including ghostwriting several review papers on glyphosate published in scientific journals and cited in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory reviews.<\/p>\n

The jury also saw documents showing Monsanto\u2019s efforts to influence EPA and other regulatory agencies, as well as evidence that Monsanto ran a public relations campaign to\u00a0plant favorable stories in Reuters and other media outlets to defend its products and discredit scientists who determined glyphosate was linked to cancer.<\/p>\n

During closing arguments, Wisner told the jury that Roundup was \u201cborn in fraud\u201d because the agrochemical received EPA approval in 1974 based on studies conducted at Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories (IBT). A subsequent EPA review of the data found that IBT routinely falsified data.\u00a0Three IBT executives were later convicted of fraud<\/a>. According to Wisner, from that point on, Monsanto repeatedly refused to conduct studies on glyphosate and Roundup, even after the EPA and its own toxicologist told Monsanto that it needed to conduct more studies to address safety concerns.<\/p>\n

After approximately 7 weeks of trial proceedings, the jury found that exposure to Roundup caused the Pilliods to develop NHL and that Monsanto failed to warn of this severe health hazard. Importantly, the jury also found that Monsanto acted with malice, oppression or fraud and should be punished for its conduct.<\/p>\n

Since the Monsanto acquisition last summer and two negative jury verdicts, Bayer has lost more than $30 billion in shareholder value.<\/p>\n

Monsanto Co. continues to refuse to warn consumers of the dangers of its multi-billion-dollar product Roundup despite the world\u2019s foremost authority on cancer\u2014the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)\u2014listing glyphosate as a probable carcinogen in 2015.<\/p>\n

Pilliod v. Monsanto Trial Transcripts<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Pilliod v. Monsanto Trial Exhibits<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Pilliod v. Monsanto Jury Instructions<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Attorneys React to Verdict Against Monsanto<\/h3>\n

After the verdict, co-lead trial counsel\u00a0R. Brent Wisner thanked the jury for dutifully listening to scientific evidence and testimony over the course of several weeks. \u201cThey were given an incredibly difficult task having to analyze the highly-complex scientific issues in this case,\u201d said Wisner. \u201cThey took detailed notes, asked incredibly thoughtful questions and in the end, came to understand that the science shows there are serious health hazards associated with Roundup and that Monsanto did nothing to warn people about the risk.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe jury saw for themselves internal company documents demonstrating that, from day one, Monsanto has never had any interest in finding out whether Roundup is safe,\u201d Wisner said. \u201cInstead of investing in sound science, they invested millions in attacking science that threatened their business agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n

Wisner also thanked everyone on the trial team, calling the victory a \u201ctrue team effort that would not have been possible without the tenacity and resolve of everyone who worked on the case.\u201d<\/p>\n

Michael Miller, who served with Wisner as co-lead trial counsel added: \u201cUnlike the first two Monsanto trials, where the judges severely limited the amount of plaintiffs\u2019 evidence, we were finally allowed to show a jury the mountain of evidence showing Monsanto\u2019s manipulation of science, the media and regulatory agencies to forward their own agenda despite Roundup\u2019s severe harm to the animal kingdom and humankind.\u201d<\/p>\n

Roundup Cancer Attorneys in Pilliod v. Monsanto<\/h3>\n

A team of attorneys from three law firms represented the Pilliods in this trial:\u00a0Michael Miller, Curtis G. Hoke, David J. Dickens and Jeffrey Travers of\u00a0The Miller Firm<\/a>\u00a0of Orange, Virginia; R. Brent Wisner, Michael L. Baum and Pedram Esfandiary of\u00a0Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman<\/a>\u00a0of Los Angeles, California; and\u00a0Mark Burton of\u00a0Audet & Partners<\/a>\u00a0of San Francisco, California.<\/p>\n

The Miller Firm and Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman co-tried the case of\u00a0Dewayne \u201cLee\u201d Johnson v. Monsanto Co.<\/a><\/em>, the first Monsanto Roundup lawsuit to proceed to trial. The case resulted in a $289.2 million jury verdict last August. The judge later\u00a0upheld the jury\u2019s verdict but reduced the punitive damages award, bringing the total award to $78.5 million.<\/p>\n

Baum Hedlund partner, R. Brent Wisner, was also part of the Hardeman trial team (the second Roundup trial) conducted by Aimee Wagstaff of Andrus Wagstaff and Jennifer Moore of Moore Law in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (federal court). Mr. Wisner\u00a0presented one of the key fact witnesses (Dr. Christopher Portier)\u00a0and he cross-examined most of the corporate witnesses in\u00a0Hardeman v. Monsanto Co<\/em>. Wisner is also administrator and co-lead counsel for the\u00a0Roundup Products Cases\u00a0JCCP 4953\u00a0<\/em>(known as the Roundup Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings or simply Roundup JCCP) before the California Superior Court for the County of Alameda (where he Pilliod trial occurred).<\/p>\n

Baum Hedlund managing partner, Michael Baum, and a team working under him assisted the Hardeman trial team as members of the\u00a0MDL Executive Committee\u00a0by presenting and preparing experts, corporate testimony and documents for\u00a0Hardeman v. Monsanto Co<\/em>. Mr. Baum is also a member of the Executive Committee for the Monsanto Roundup MDL (federal multi-district litigation). Mr. Miller is a co-leader of the Roundup MDL Executive Committee.<\/p>\n

Press Conference Information:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Alva and Alberta Pilliod will provide a statement on the verdict. Attorneys Michael Miller of the Miller Firm and Brent Wisner of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman will also give statements and answer questions.<\/p>\n

Time: 4:30<\/p>\n

Location: Audet & Partners, LLP
\n711 Van Ness Ave., Suite 500
\nSan Francisco, CA 94102
\n415-568-2555<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Baum Hedlund Law, 13 May 2019 | Source May 13,\u00a02019 \u2013 Oakland, California \u2013 \u2013\u00a0An Alameda jury in the\u00a0case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto Company (Case No. RG17862702, JCCP No. 4953)\u00a0returned a verdict today of $2.055 billion in favor of a husband and wife with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ordering Monsanto to\u00a0pay $55 million in\u00a0compensatory damages\u00a0and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11141,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pgc_sgb_lightbox_settings":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[162,50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-in-the-news","category-news","thematic_area-food-for-health","thematic_area-poison-free-future"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/monsanto-over-2-billion-img.jpg","wpml_translations":[{"language_code":"en","post_id":11130,"original":true}],"custom_fields":{"_edit_lock":["1560432611:2"],"_edit_last":["2"],"_wpml_media_featured":["1"],"_wpml_media_duplicate":["1"],"_alp_processed":["1560427239"],"_thumbnail_id":["11141"],"_wp_old_date":["2019-06-13"],"wpl_sidebar_option":["on"],"wpl_featured_image_post":["on"],"wpl_share_buttons":["on"],"_wpml_media_has_media":["1"]},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9KkNM-2Tw","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11130"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11148,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11130\/revisions\/11148"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}