{"id":50412,"date":"2025-10-31T12:47:25","date_gmt":"2025-10-31T10:47:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/?p=50412"},"modified":"2026-01-07T14:04:48","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T12:04:48","slug":"seeds-of-resistance-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/ca\/seeds-of-resistance-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Seeds of Resistance: GMO Deregulation and Grassroots Mobilization"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Across continents, a coordinated corporate and governmental assault on biosafety is accelerating as powerful interests push to deregulate genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and new gene-editing technologies (NGTs). This global trend rolls back essential regulations, privatizes the governance of our food systems, and replaces state-led risk assessment with corporate self-regulation. In direct opposition, a powerful wave of grassroots resistance is rising. Led by farmers, indigenous peoples, and civil society movements, this global mobilization challenges the narrative that gene technologies are the inevitable future of food, reframing the conflict as a fundamental political struggle over who controls our seeds, our food, and our ecological future.<\/p>\n

The debate is driven by two profoundly conflicting narratives. On one side, industry and government proponents frame deregulation as essential for “innovation” and “climate resilience,” rebranding new genomic techniques as “precise” and “natural-like” to secure fast-tracked market entry with minimal oversight. In stark contrast, this report marshals overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating the profound risks of this agenda. It exposes how deregulation is a vehicle for heightened corporate control and new forms of digital biopiracy, where genetic data from the commons is patented using Digital Sequence Information (DSI) without ever leaving the lab. Critically, with no international scientific consensus on GMO\/NGT safety, the report details how techniques like CRISPR can bypass natural repair mechanisms and cause unforeseen impacts on plant metabolism, as seen in the GABA tomato, directly refuting industry claims of precision.<\/p>\n

Seeds of Resistance provides a comprehensive global analysis of these dynamics, with in-depth case studies from Latin America, Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Europe. The report illuminates how the “Argentina model”\u2014a regulatory framework being replicated globally that exempts gene-edited crops from all GMO safety and labeling laws if they contain no foreign DNA\u2014is being used to accelerate corporate capture. Simultaneously, it documents the remarkable success of grassroots defiance. This includes landmark victories such as Mexico’s landmark constitutional amendment, which legally enshrines native maize as a national biocultural heritage, and the court-ordered halt to the commercialization of both Golden Rice and Bt Eggplant in the Philippines, a legal triumph for farmers and food sovereignty advocates. These examples reveal a deeply polarized landscape where corporate power is met with sophisticated, community-led resistance.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, this report reveals that the struggle over GMOs is a fight to defend life itself against commodification. It is about protecting seeds as living ancestors and the cultural commons\u2014the legacy of millennia of farmers\u2019 breeding\u2014from being reduced to patented intellectual property. More than an analysis of the problem, this report is a powerful testament to the resilient, life-affirming alternatives already flourishing in fields worldwide. It showcases how agroecology and community-led seed systems offer true resilience, foster biodiversity, and secure food sovereignty.<\/p>\n

December 2025 update:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

In December 2025, the Council and the European Parliament reached a provisional trilogue agreement on new rules for so\u2011called new genomic techniques, creating a two\u2011tier system that distinguishes between \u201cNGT 1\u201d plants, treated as equivalent to conventional varieties, and \u201cNGT 2\u201d plants, which remain under the existing GMO regime. For NGT 1, the deal would largely remove prior risk assessment, traceability, and labeling obligations, while NGT 2 plants would still be subject to GMO rules and allow member states to opt out of their cultivation [1]<\/small>. The deal is still pending final approval in Parliament and Council and has already been denounced by farmers\u2019, organic, environmental, and consumer organizations across Europe, who have called on legislators to reject or substantially amend the text, as it represents a serious threat to food sovereignty, seed autonomy, and the precautionary principle [2]<\/small> .<\/em><\/p>\n

[1] Council of the European Union. New Genomic Techniques: Council and Parliament Strike Deal to Boost the Competitiveness and Sustainability of Our Food Systems<\/i>. 4 Dec. 2025,\u00a0https:\/\/www.consilium.europa.eu\/en\/press\/press-releases\/2025\/12\/04\/new-genomic-techniques-council-and-parliament-strike-deal-to-boost-the-competitiveness-and-sustainability-of-our-food-systems\/<\/a><\/small>
\n[2] EU lawmakers must reject the deal to deregulate new GMOs.\u201d\u00a0Navdanya International<\/em>, 4 Dec. 2025,\u00a0https:\/\/navdanyainternational.org\/eu-lawmakers-must-reject-the-deal-to-deregulate-new-gmos\/<\/span><\/a><\/small><\/p>\n